• Welcome
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Direct Financial Giving
    • What We Fund
    • Where We Fund
    • How it Works
    • Program Evaluation
    • IRS Status
    • Who we are
  • Why 12 Months?
  • Donors
  • Applicants
  • Opioid Use Disorder
  • More
    • Welcome
    • About
      • Mission and Vision
      • Direct Financial Giving
      • What We Fund
      • Where We Fund
      • How it Works
      • Program Evaluation
      • IRS Status
      • Who we are
    • Why 12 Months?
    • Donors
    • Applicants
    • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Welcome
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Direct Financial Giving
    • What We Fund
    • Where We Fund
    • How it Works
    • Program Evaluation
    • IRS Status
    • Who we are
  • Why 12 Months?
  • Donors
  • Applicants
  • Opioid Use Disorder

Program Evaluation


Our systematic approach for evaluating The Social CareRx Initiative is designed to assess the effectiveness of small targeted cash assistance for individuals with OUD as a step to improving social and economic stability. The evaluation will provide valuable insights into the impact of the program and inform decision-making in the future.


Evaluation Objectives:


  1. Validate the effectiveness of small direct financial giving in improving social and economic stability for individuals with OUD.
  2. Assess the feasibility of the program delivery and identify any barriers to access.
  3. Determine the satisfaction of recipients and identify areas for improvement.
  4. Assess sustainability and potential for scale.



Evaluation Methodology:


  1. Quantitative Data Collection: Surveys 
  2. Qualitative Data Collection: Key informant interviews, case studies.
  3. Program Data Analysis: The collected data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics and data analysis to identify patterns and trends, and to make comparisons between the pre- and post-program outcomes.
  4. Program Outcome Evaluation: The effectiveness of the program will be evaluated by measuring changes in indicators before and after cash assistance. 






Sample Outcome Indicators


We know that outcomes will vary and depend on factors such as the severity of OUD, access to other resources, and the baseline social economic context.  However, these are samples of indicators that could be measured, particularly if increased and ongoing funding existed.


 Short-term outcomes include:


  • Increased engagement in treatment: By providing financial support, it can help individuals stay in treatment.


  • Increased stability: Direct cash assistance can help individuals pay for basic needs such as shelter and transportation, improving their overall stability and well-being.


  • Reduced stress and anxiety: By alleviating financial strain, it can reduce the stress and anxiety faced by individuals in treatment, which can improve their mental health and well-being.



Intermediate-term outcomes include:


  • Increased employment and income: With improved stability and support, individuals  may be able to generate  income, further promoting their economic stability.


  • Reduced drug use: By supporting individuals already in treatment, this many continue to reduce drug use and increase their chances of successful recovery.



Long-term outcomes include:


  • Sustained recovery: Individuals may be more likely to maintain their recovery over 12 months.


  • Improved overall health: By reducing drug use over 12 months individuals may experience improved physical and mental health.


  • Positive impact on families and friends: This approach, if well-funded, could have a positive impact on families and communities by reducing the burden of addiction and promoting recovery and stability for those affected by it.



Outcome indicators specific to social and economic stability include:


  • Employment rate: The percentage of program participants who are employed.


  • Income level: The average income of program participants, compared to the poverty line and pre-program income.


  • Housing stability: The percentage of program participants who have stable shelter, defined as not experiencing lack of shelter or having to move frequently.


  • Substance use: The percentage of program participants who have reduced or ceased substance use.


  • Mental health: The rate of program participants who report improved mental health, as measured by standardized assessments or self-reported improvement.


  • Savings and asset accumulation: The amount of money participants are able to save and the increase in assets they have accumulated, such as a savings account or car.


  • Educational attainment: The number of program participants who have pursued and completed additional education or training programs.




Sample Process Indicators

We will be able to answer such questions such as:


  1. How many eligible individuals have completed the eligibility assessment?
  2. What is the satisfaction of program participants with the application process?
  3. What is feedback from stakeholders?
  4. How many individuals are receiving cash assistance?
  5. How long does it take to distribute cash assistance?
  6. What measures are in place to ensure the program is ethical and respects the rights and dignity of individuals with OUD?



And several more.


Every Penny Matters. We Thank You.

PLEASE GIVE HERE

Copyright © 2022 SocialHealthRx. All Rights Reserved.

EVERY PENNY HELPS US BRIDGE A GAP.

  • Welcome
  • Mission and Vision
  • Direct Financial Giving
  • What We Fund
  • Where We Fund
  • How it Works
  • Program Evaluation
  • Why 12 Months?
  • Donors
  • Applicants
  • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Contact Us

Help us bridge the gap for someone who needs it.

Help SocialCareRx  "Bridge the Gap" for those in need.

Learn more

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept